Interactive Digital Workbook — Demo
Interactive Digital Workbook
Dr Pauline Prevett
School of Environment, Education and Development • University of Manchester
Understand different approaches, when to use them, and how they differ philosophically
Match research questions, paradigm, and analysis method to your own research aims
Interactive exercises with your reflections saved automatically throughout
Code transcripts directly in your browser with real data
Follow "Sarah" through complete analyses across approaches
Guided tools to align methods with your research questions
Your reflections persist between sessions and can be exported
This workbook treats qualitative analysis as a craft that must be practised, not just studied. Each chapter provides conceptual foundations plus interactive exercises with immediate feedback. Don't just read about coding—actually code. Don't just learn about IPA—annotate transcripts yourself.
Every text box in the workbook automatically saves your work:
Your reflection on this approach:
✓ Saved in browser • Last updated: 2 minutes ago
Every keystroke saves to your browser automatically
Export your notes as JSON for backup or submission
Reload your work on any device
Your reflections stay in your browser
Building from foundations to advanced interpretation, with tools throughout:
Linguistic markers, hedging, modality detection
Format and prepare raw transcripts
Step-by-step coding with audit trail
Choose the right approach for your RQ
The same data looks different through different methodological lenses. Try it yourself:
IsolationBelongingIdentity shiftTransition
What thematic analysis reveals: Common patterns across student experience—initial isolation, the role of activities in building belonging, identity development. These themes can be compared across multiple participants.
Social integration (4 refs): "lost", "photography society", "organising events", "people to sit with"
Identity (3 refs): "quiet one", "someone different", "forced me to become"
What QCA reveals: Systematic application shows this extract is primarily about social integration. Framework enables transparent comparison across cases.
Normative discourse: "Everyone else seemed to know" draws on university-readiness as normal. Struggle framed as individual deficit.
Self-improvement discourse: "Forced me to become someone different" invokes developmental discourse.
What's absent: No critique of institutional structures. Loneliness framed as personal journey.
Narrative structure: Classic transformation story—disorientation → turning point → resolution
Self-positioning: Past self as passive ("quiet one") vs present self as agentic ("organising events")
Identity work: Story legitimises current identity while maintaining connection to past self
Thematic found common patterns (isolation → belonging → identity shift). QCA systematically applied theory categories. Discourse revealed ideological assumptions. Narrative examined how storytelling constructs identity.
None is the "right" analysis—each answers different questions. Your choice should follow from what you want to know.
| If your RQ asks... | Consider... |
|---|---|
| What patterns exist across participants? | Thematic Analysis, QCA |
| What is the lived experience of X? | IPA, Phenomenological |
| How do people construct identity through stories? | Narrative Analysis |
| How does discourse shape what can be said? | Discourse Analysis |
The workbook helps you build coherent research designs for your own project:
Refine your RQ with guided prompts. What kind of knowledge are you seeking?
Match your assumptions about reality and knowledge to appropriate methods
Craft questions that generate data suitable for your chosen analysis
Systematic guidance for choosing your analytical approach
Your paradigm, research question, data collection, and analysis must align. Using interpretivist interviewing but positivist analysis creates incoherence. The workbook helps you check alignment at each stage.
Every chapter includes reflection points to connect learning to your own research:
📝 Reflection: Applying to Your Project
Having explored thematic analysis and IPA, which approach seems more suited to your research question? What would you gain and lose with each choice?
✓ Saved
These reflections build into a personal record of your methodological thinking—useful for your methodology chapter and viva preparation.
Built-in tools for working with your own data:
Automatic detection of linguistic markers, hedging, modality, epistemic stance—useful for discourse and narrative work
Format raw transcripts for analysis: remove timestamps, structure speaker turns, prepare for coding
Step-by-step coding with drag-and-drop theme building and automatic audit trail
Build and apply category frameworks with frequency tracking
Apply Labov's model, identify positioning, map identity work
Apply frameworks like Bandura's self-efficacy, Gee's identity lenses to your data
Chapter 8 addresses the crucial skill of moving from "what" to "why":
"Participants mentioned feeling isolated after the change."
Surface level—what is in the data
"The restructure disrupted communities of practice, severing informal support networks."
Deeper level—what it means theoretically
Chapter 8 includes tools for applying theoretical frameworks to your data—demonstrating how deep theoretical knowledge enables refined interpretation. Practice moving beyond "participants said X" to "this reveals Y about Z."
Chapter 9 covers essential cross-cutting concerns:
How your position shapes the research—a resource, not bias
Ongoing practice, not just approval—consent, anonymisation, representation
Documenting decisions for transparency
Credibility, transferability—different from validity
The reflections and coding decisions you save throughout the workbook can be exported as evidence of your analytical process—useful for methodology chapters and demonstrating rigour to examiners.
Chapter 10 brings everything together with planning tools:
Systematic questions to guide your choice of analytical approach
Identify key readings for your chosen method
Design questions aligned with your analysis method
Verify alignment across paradigm, RQ, data collection, and analysis
Download your reflections, method decisions, and interview schedule as a document to include in your research proposal or methodology chapter.
Interactive Digital Workbook for Postgraduate Researchers
Reader in Education
School of Environment, Education and Development • University of Manchester
Try Chapter 1 with full interactive features
10 chapters + tools + save features
Lesson plans, slides & session workbooks
Individual & institutional licences available (12-month access)
Scan to visit